Government Must Not Subsidize Dereliction
Paying for babies and children who have parents that do not help and financially support their own children is a bad trend, which leads to family chaos, community ruin. Societal decay. We all understand that the nuclear family has gone through major problems in our lifetime. I have been around since the beginning of the 1970s. Children without both parents have struggled. We understand not every family can have two parents. But does the government need to subsidize a child from conception to adulthood?
No. Kids without strong parental support, guidance, and supervision, often become societal problems. Drug use, dealing with illegal alcohol consumption and other illicit behaviors. Many of them have relations in jail and prison. Their fathers, their uncles, their cousins, their brothers are locked up, repeat offenders on the wrong side of the law. Other poor behaviors crop up in huge communities of deadbeat fathers, how many millions who do not help in raising their progeny?
Millions depend on government checks to survive. Food, shelter, healthcare.
Am I describing a particular demographic that you know, or that you know of? If I am, than the facts of which I speak line up.
All of us benefit from the U.S. government, even the wealthy. Our taxes subsidize so many things for the common benefit: the military, research and development, homeland security and law enforcement, transportation, medicines and public health, social services, veteran benefits, public housing, the corrections systems.
The corrections system might be a giant misnomer.
We all may be unintentionally funding and abetting generations of derelicts. We ourselves might be part and parcel of the dereliction.
How do we define dereliction?
[ˌderəˈlikSH(ə)n]
No comments:
Post a Comment