Saturday, June 30, 2018

Orson Scott Card: Voice of a Sub-Minority

Orson Scott Card: Voice of a Sub-Minority

Or maybe multiple minorities.

Back in the spring of 1988 I was trying to put together a project that my English teacher had assigned us as juniors in high school.  I was in a Gifted and Talented, rather, Honors English class with many bright students at Bloomington High School South. Many of the students of this class were children of college professors, quite literate and knowledgeable in their own rights. I tried to belong. The multi-faceted task involved picking a subject that we felt strongly about and exploring it, writing and researching about it, creating and producing various papers and reports on it.

Arriving at this choice was clear for me, but then difficult.  The subject-matter that I chose was: What was it to being Mormon? A Latter-day Saint, who were we? What was I? What did it mean?

By my 17th year I knew that as a devout member of my church, I was a minority.  It was not about skin color or national heritage, it was about who I was based on the choices and beliefs that I held.

I was different, and I knew it.  I wanted to somehow present and define that. Express something personal and at the same time capture an identity that was existent in the world, a real thing.  Again, this was not based on my skin color or my parents nation of origin, being Mexican or Korean. But Mexicans and Koreans existed that were of my minority. I wanted to speak for all of us, back then some 7 or 8 million worldwide.

Folks on the Fringe, we Latter-day Saints. How to convey that message? How to understand how we were? What we were? If we were? 

Was this real, this identity that made me feel distanced from the rest? Or was it only me?

What was it that connected and marginalized me from everyone? Was this normal? Could you quantify or qualify it? Mormon-ness?

And... I struggled to do it. I ended up putting together some essays and I think a poem; I did not feel that it was satisfactory, but perhaps it earned a sufficient grade.

Little did I know that Orson Scott Card was writing up a storm of things that I could have used as sources, specifically about "our people". In the 1980s. 

And me, in the great American mid-west, a college townie in the mid-point between Kirtland and Nauvoo, the lands fled by the original Saints to the relative safety of the Rockies, the Great Salt Lake. 

What was this? Who was I in it? Did it really matter as much as I thought it did, among thousands of others that I had known till then?

Fast forward to 2018. I just read a book, a collection of short stories and novellas that Card published in the 1980s. Maybe it would have helped me back then. Maybe not.

I was preparing to go on a two year mission-- maybe his visions and  perspectives would have detracted from me and my path, I am not sure. I was not aware of his presence in the world of popular "sf", as they call it. I had read my share of science fiction, however. Arthur C. Clarke was my favorite.

I finally became more aware of this popular sci-fi author in the 1990s. I read Ender's Game in 1996-7. I very much liked it. I later read an article about a campus visit he made to MIT in Boston in 1997, while I was visiting the school. I did not have access to any internet web where things like his were easily or even pains-takenly found. Card's quotes had me wondering what type of LDS guy he was. He used earthy language a bit, not something I equated with being virtuous LDS.  I questioned his motives, his aims as real member or perhaps an associate of the faith. Ethnically Mormon? But not really its own ethnicity, but a sub-portion of one.

In the early 2000s I read the first of the Homecoming  books, loosely based on the Book of Mormon. I was not impressed.  My wife read a fantasy of Card's about that time or a little later, and enjoyed it. She also was able to read all three Bible books that Card wrote about the women of the Old Testament; I knew he was a great narrator and writer because my wife ate these up. Later, by 2009-10 I read some more of his Ender books, and very much enjoyed them, also while meeting people in Virginia who were old friends of his and called him Scotty, and knew him on a personal basis. One of my acquaintances even co-wrote a book with him. (They were supposed make it into a trilogy that never materialized). He sang at her funeral, which I missed but was interested to learn about.

And now, spring-summer break of 2018 I come across the 1980s "The Folk of the Fringe". Very heavy with Latter-day Saint material and subjects. I could have used it for my project as a high schooler, and scored more points, expanded the literary foundation for my people, our people, the Saints.

As of now he is 66. He is a voice of Mormons, a voice of science fiction.

He is one person to represent a minority that needs more voices.

Now we have the world wide web, a forum and tool that he and perhaps a few others envisioned in the sci-fi of the past.

We in some ways are more connected than ever.

We still need more, that is certain. He has created a presence in the market of ideas.

And there will be more.

Are we on the fringe? Are we peripheral? Are we marginalized, stigmatized?

More voices must weigh in.

I thank Brother Card for sharing. There will be more voices to this project.



 

Friday, June 29, 2018

Harper Makes it to 170; Ties my Favorite in Under Seven Years

Harper Makes it to 170 Home Runs; Ties my Favorite in Under Seven Years

Bryce Harper has been in a slump most of June (2018) but finally hit his National League league leading 20th homer tonight in a big 17-7 win over the division rival Phillies.  The Phils are tought and have been competitive all season so far. Harper is now at 170 for his career, which ties him with my Hall of Fame all time favorite player Tim Raines, Senior. And a few others.  

He has hit better the last week, raising his average over .220. He should continue to pull his average up along with his team. The team overall has not scored a lot lately, getting shut out too much and not winning very well. Luckily the Division leading Braves have not been too hot, so the Nats only trail by 3-4 games.

Again, Raines took 23 years to accrue 170, but he was not a power hitter. He was a jet fast good/great hitter who had some power. Bryce is in another category.

Bryce now has 41 active players who rank ahead of him, including two on his team (Reynolds and Zimmerman). His teammate from the last few years who is still ahead of him, Jayson Werth, just announced his retirement.

 
422.Joe Cronin+ (20)170RHR Log
 Bob Elliott (15)170RHR Log
 Jim Ray Hart (12)170RHR Log
 Kevin Millar (12)170RHR Log
 Tim Raines+ (23)170BHR Log

 

 Br

 

Thursday, June 28, 2018

Reading CS Lewis

Reading CS Lewis

A month or more ago I asked my 17 year-old daughter, who has read a great deal in her lifetime (although there is a lot more that I would like her to read, as I wish for myself at age 47), who was her favorite author of all writers?

Her answer surprised me. "C.S. Lewis." she replied.
This response, I believe due in most part, was based on her having read only the Chronicles of Narnia.

I agree in part that he is a personal favorite for me; he is an extremely powerful writer; his books are impactful; his writings are great.

The Chronicles of Narnia-- books one through seven-- are my favorite of all time from my childhood. Beyond that, his non-fiction and Christian writing is some of the best literature in existence, especially for Christians and believers in faith unseen. For those who believe there is a deeper love in the realm of God and eternal love through Him.

I need to read more of him. So does my daughter. And my wife. And everyone else.

My dad introduced my sisters and I to The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe and the rest of the series as we were children. He read them, and he read and owned the science fiction trilogy, and much of the non-fiction. I read and re-read the seven part series. I loved it.

And as my eldest child grew up, she gravitated towards science fiction and fantasy as many youth do, and she ate up the Chronicles of Narnia and other classic tales, like the Hobbit, the Lord of the Rings, A Wrinkle in Time, and other more modern fantasy tales.

I felt it was natural to read the Chronicles of Narnia, and healthy as a believer of what I believed. A deeper magic, as Lewis might call it.

To my chagrin, the next children did not take to it, or reading as much in general, as my eldest. And, I also did not realize that after all this time after she had read the Chronicles that CS Lewis' work meant so much to her, five or six grades later. I knew it meant a lot to me, and I am pretty confident that the next children knew as well that I had revered the books. They certainly enjoyed the first three film versions.  So, I urged them and tried to motivate them to read them. On snow days the past year or so I would say, "Read a chapter of Prince Caspian or the Silver Chair," or whichever one that they were in. And I would come home from work and they had not!

They would not read the books! They said they did not enjoy them!

INCOMPREHENSIBLE!

It's like saying you do not like ice cream.

WHAAAAAATT??

Later the second oldest daughter, who reads a lot of books, mostly fiction, said it was the obligation by me that would turn her and perhaps the boys from reading them.

Me, on the other hand, am of the opinion that if you simply read these books, the magic takes over and you love them. Right? 

Like ice cream. But better.

Now one is about to start high school and has still not finished the series!

Preposterous! Blasphemy! Poppycock! Balderdash!

How sad.

My child has not read and thoroughly enjoyed, yea, even been enthralled by the Chronicles of Narnia as a youth? Is this my flesh and blood?

Is the sky, in fact, blue?

Maybe not. 

Maybe ice cream is not that great after all. Especially if you are forced, as it seems, to like it.

Recently I have resolved to read it--the entire series of Narnia-- out loud to my children after I finish another series that it has taken a few years to read to them. But, I still hold out hope that we can do it individually. That CS Lewis can be read by each one of us, and cherished as they should be, by children young and old.

Aslan awaits.

And you will know the deeper magic of the eternal realms; you will not be able to help but like it. A lot. It is CS Lewis, and it is love eternal, a higher understanding.






Sunday, June 24, 2018

The Prophetess of Doom and: to Each Their Own Work

The Prophetess of Doom and: to Each Their Own Work

     Last night I was out walking on a city street with my wife. We were going to a store that interested her; we were walking the city streets to approach it, where the side walks had assorted trees contained in metallic circular frames surrounded by pavement.  As I walked by a lady in front of the store, I noticed that she was staring at the side of a tree emplaced in front of the establishment. The tree might have been 25 feet high. Maybe it was a foot in width.

I found it interesting that a woman, or any person for that matter, would be doing that.  My wife and I walked into the store. We were not there very long. When I exited the front door area I observed that the lady was standing on the sidewalk. I asked her, "Were you looking at that tree?"

She was friendly and explained that the tree had a blight and was dying; the tree had not only one fungus or killer blight, she remarked, but the trunk had one disease while above in its crest and upper branches there seemed to be another. Multiple blights were killing this thing. We talked a bit.  I gathered that she was increasingly  alarmed by these types of ugly trends killing trees that she had observed for years. "I am old," she said, "but my grandson has to grow up with this ..."

I derived from the whole scenario that she was, as she claimed, a talkative introvert, and I suggested that she write a blog about this global problem, and local in this case, too.  I thought that this might quench a bit of her long held angst, and even help this specific problem be addressed and bring greater light to the solution of it. "Oh, no!" She replied. "I would not write about this doom and gloom unless I had a solution for it!"

Make sense?

I thought that this was contradictory. If she really cares, then she could do more.

I am not saying that a blog would or will save the world ...

But it would do more than staring at blights on trees that she has been observing for years-- and not help at all. Not causing ANY outside awareness to her observations, which appear to be true and valid, significant. I told her by only highlighting to anyone would possibly bring new ideas or possible solutions.

We talked about carbon footprints, and flying, and radiation, and the problems of future health. She mentioned her son flies all the time and the "radiation" of it worries her, but not him, and he should take iodine to stave off future problems related to so much flight time.

Lunatic or prophetess?

I think she is probably right.

Trees are dying of new amalgamating and evolving blights and diseases. Regular flying can be detrimental to your health, for all I know.

Welcome to our globalizing 21st century world.

Every generation has at last one watch person on the watchtower to warn of impending danger and doom.

We have them. Like Noah?

Do we listen? Do we share their insight and wisdom? From Adam until 2018? Do we read the wisdom of the sages and prophets?

I am trying. Consider yourself advised. I will continue to watch and pray.

Pray for our trees, and how to fight the diseases that destroy them and us. For ourselves, and our grandchildren.

One more thing: sin is real, and we need a cure called repentance. We need to find it. Always.


Saturday, June 23, 2018

Are LDS Racists? Part II

Are LDS Racists? Part II

Has there been a historical case of racism among the Mormons?

Continued from: http://clinchitsoonerorlater.blogspot.com/2018/06/are-mormons-racists-have-they-been.html

If you happened to have read the last post issued posing the question based on summaries and points regarding racism during the 1800s and the LDS Church, you may note that I mentioned baseball.

For the continued review of "Are Mormons racist, or have they been racist historically?" we will proceed to share thoughts and facts, beliefs and precedents from each decade of the 1900s until the 1930s. We will start by addressing the very American subject of its historic pastime, baseball.

Going into its second hundred years as a nation, now solidified with generations of post-slavery former owned and owners, and with a newly formed international footprint (post-Spanish-American War), the United States of America was a melting pot of multiple ethnicities. However, the top three ethnic groups to that point were more or less established as ethnically British, German, or African-American, and by far most of them tended to be Protestant.

The 20th century brought a whole new diverse influx of more ethnic diversity; linguistically, religiously, culturally, the United States grew in complexity with large waves of immigrants who were not the traditional white of Britain or Germany or the black African-American heritage from the legacy of slaves. There were Irish Catholics, Italian Catholics, east European Jewish and other Catholics and Eastern Orthodox from Poland and the Balkans. Asians from the Pacific were coming to the United States, and settling, like Chinese and Japanese; Latinos were finding themselves on the US side across the border from Mexico. Even native Americans were integrating into the larger US context of the American people, groups that had been marginalized were to some degree welcomed into the greater growing society, with far flung natively strong Alaska and Hawaii, Guam and American Samoa incorporating into the land of the free, extended to all.

Baseball became the quintessential American sport, uniting most peoples, at least in the northeast of the country. However, it is well known that blacks were excluded, that they had their own leagues that were not as popular or lucrative as the top league for whites and non-blacks in the original founding 16 US cities of the northeast.

For much of the United States throughout the 20th century baseball indicated normalcy and acceptance. Anyone who wasn't black had a fair shot, at least until it became all integrated by the late 1940s. Then it truly became the fair parameter for judgment across the races. But it was not so in the first half the 20th century.

The Latter-day Saints and blacks both struggled for normalcy and acceptance throughout the early times of the 20th century. African-Americans made up large numbers in the South; millions migrated towards the industrial jobs in the north. Some made their way to the western cities and even agricultural areas of the West Coast, especially California. Mormons slowly spread in some areas to all parts of the country, also to California in larger numbers. Latter-day Saints went to foreign lands and saw significant growth in some areas of the world, including Canada, Mexico, Latin America, parts of Europe, East Asia, and the South Pacific.

I cannot speak from personal experience during the times in the early 1900s, because I was not born until the century was over two thirds over. Also, my ancestors were neither black nor Mormon back then.

However, based on my understanding of how things progressed the last 118 years, here are some impressions.

The 1900s.

With new statehood for Utah (1896), a Mormon state with a decent population, and other LDS settlements in the Inter-Mountain west, its somewhat different former polygamist membership was newly reaching out socially and politically to the rest of the country, and by default to the rest of the world. Latter-day Saints were becoming more racially diverse, but not much in the ways of African-Americans, based on exclusive priesthood and temple polices established by Brigham Young in the 1850s. Blacks were also expanding socially and politically in the United States, but there were obvious double standards in the country socially, economically, and because of inherently unfair de facto and other legal differences between whites and those of color, especially African-Americans (like the infamous Jim Crow laws).

Despite the racial segregation of America's sport baseball, this somewhat unifying institution brought together Catholics and Jews and Latinos, the formerly entrenched White Anglo Saxon Protestants all intermixing with people of all backgrounds, cheering on the new Yankees or Senators or White Sox, regardless of ethnic back ground. Poles and Italians, Jews of all backgrounds, were celebrated as well as the traditional WASPS since the nation's founding.
Granted, the US was a racist or racially divided place; Mormons and blacks fell into that American divide. They did not live close to one another, in general, and their spheres of influence over each other were not great. In sheer numbers, Mormons were pushing above a quarter million members while blacks in the US numbered over 8.8 million nationwide. That is a ratio of 32 to 1, while almost no black Mormons were among the church rolls except the small numbers who had crossed the plains in the original days of the pioneers, albeit minimal per the statistics of the tens of thousands who accomplished this feat. Over the 20th century, the ratio of blacks to LDS has shrunk, which is augmented by the later adoption of the Second Manifesto of 1978. And perhaps the higher  birth rates, longer living standards, and conversion rates of the Latter-day Saints helped in the shrinkage. Of this original 32 to 1 ratio.

Jack Johnson, an amazing boxing athlete and black pioneer who probably does not get enough due in US racial history one hundred plus years later, was an example of a black man who broke barriers in the early 1900s. The United States remained painfully segregated 50 years after emancipation (1863). The amazing multi-athlete Jim Thorpe was a native American who proved truly outstanding and gained world-wide respect. But white America was still very exclusive despite amazing athletes such as him. Meanwhile, a few Mormon athletes performed as Olympians, but none to a significant degree of fame or recognizable status. Part of being accepted by the country is becoming a part of the social and sports scene, which blacks were doing, like in the popular sport of boxing.

Conclusion for the 1900s: While the United States was gaining in some significant ways for the progress of newly stated Utahn Mormons and its periphery, and also notable progress was made for African-Americans as they continued to spread across the country, the two populations did not come in contact very much, and did not seem to influence the other much. The great newly codified sport of  baseball, while providing equal opportunity for Latter-day Saints in the West, was not existent as a major league sport past the Mississippi River, and neither were American minorities to have much impact in this "northeast sport". These two minorities were still somewhat isolated from "regular" American life, and baseball was indicative of that.

The 1910s:

The World War in Europe from 1914-1918 changed the United States (and the world), proving that America was a global power and that it played a large part in global affairs; that the dough boys were truly "all" Americans, no matter their ethnic origins. In this war it was proven that we all bled the same despite differences in worship and skin color.

By the beginning of the decade (1910) the LDS numbers hit almost 400, 000, which does include international numbers, many of whom would migrate to the US eventually. African-Americans had grown in size to approximately 9.5 million, based on averaging the twenty year censuses surrounding 1910. The ratio of African-Americans to Mormons had dropped below 25 to 1 in a decade.

Conclusion for the 1920s: Culturally and racially the United States became more diverse in the Roaring Twenties; military conflict led to new mixing of social groups previously not involved with each other. Religiously the country became much more Catholic and Jewish, and Mormons continued to expand their sphere of influence, which had some cross over with black populations, most likely in West Coast cities like Los Angeles and California. Did LDS have any influence over racist Jim Crow laws or other attempts at keeping blacks from having political rights? Probably not.

Did statements by former Church leaders like Brigham Young and its exclusive priesthood policy, sometimes in justification for the spiritual nature of "the Negro" not being eligible for priesthood and temple blessings help bolster other white segregationists across the US? Did it help keep African-Americans from integrating into normal American activities and acceptance like major league baseball? I think that the United States was already on this segregationist course regardless of Latter-day Saint practices.

1920 LDS Overall Membership: 525,000

African-American: 10.4 million
Ratio: Approximately 25 to 1 ratio African-American to US Latter-day Saints. (Again, much of that overall number of LDS are internal to the US, perhaps one fifth being non-American).

1930s: 

The time of the great Depression affected everyone across all ethnic lines in the United States and around the world. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and its members weathered the financial storms in decent fashion as an organization and as general members despite universal hardships; some might say that due to some inspired leadership and inherent industriousness of its stalwart members, by virtue of the existential nature of their ways, the LDS more or less did better than most other Americans during the long decade of penury and hardships.

For generations, since its inception in the 1830s until the time of the Great Depression of the 1930s (100 years, up to five generations of this newly founded people), the Latter-day Saints throughout the base of the Inter-Mountain West had come to by and large own their land, own their property, and to master it.

I surmise this conclusion  and the following general statements more in anecdotal logic than by quantitative proof: the line of reasoning of how land-owning agriculturalists (as many of the LDS of the 1930s tended to be) could be more protected financially than urban based laborers, is a thesis worth considering. In many ways Mormons in the 1930s, at least in the United States, were ready for this crisis of the stock market crash and job losses better than most. Certainly they were better prepared than the blacks of the United States in general, who were largely congregated in many urban areas, or residing in swaths in the US South where there was little wealth in their land ownership.


Having gone through the second most difficult economic crisis in the last 150 years as recently as 2008-2011, there are some corollaries that may be derived in order to analyze how people suffer and what wealth is at risk when economies "go south", or people lose their investments and jobs and chances to get ahead economically.


Despite Jesse Owens proving Hitler absurd in Berlin at the 1936 Summer Games, the United States was still painfully segregated, was unfair to the hopes and dreams of African-Americans among others, and was by definition, racist in the rough economic times of this decade. The United States deprived blacks of equal rights, hence the movements in the 1950s and the 1960s that would advance their and other causes.

The Church of Jesus Christ in the 1930s, like the country at large, the governments that ruled the majority of the states and the cities and communities, and many religious and other US social institutions like baseball, golf, and schools, was not inclusive in its policy towards African-Americans.  While this missionary-oriented church was attempting to reach out to more parts of the world in diversity, in practice in inclusion of all races (specifically black descendants from Africa).

The next decades would change things for the country and all diverse groups for the better. And the Church would adapt to its policies as well.

1930s: 
LDS Overall:  670,000 (possibly 500,000 US-based LDS)
African-American: 11.9 million
(Ratio ) Approximately 24 African-Americans per one LDS member, who were primarily white, minimal members that were black but without priesthood authority or temple access.

____________________________________________________________
BELOW: SAVED FOR PART III

1940s:
LDS Overall: 862,000
African-American: 12.7 million

1950s: 
LDS Overall: 1.1 million
African-American: 15 million

1960s:
LDS Overall: 1.7 million
African-American: 18.8 million

1970s:
LDS Overall: 2.9 million
African-American: 22.6 million

1980s:
LDS Overall: 4.6 million
African-American: 26.7 million

1990s:
LDS Overall: 7.8 million (about 4 million in the United States)
African-American: 30 million

2000s:
LDS Overall: 11.1 million (about 5 million in the United States)
African-American: 39 million

2010s:
LDS Overall (14 million, 6.1 million in the United States)
African-American: 38.9 million (black alone, not counting 1-2 million mixed raced)

 



Monday, June 11, 2018

Bryce One HR Short of My Favorite, Tim Raines

Bryce One HR Short of My Favorite, Tim Raines

I miscounted on my last blog post about the rank of the Bryce Bomber. He was not at 168 when I posted it.

He is now up to 169 total. Tim Raines, my favorite all time player, 1979-2002, hit a total of 170 home runs in a 23 year career. But Raines was a lead-off hitter, a speedy run scorer. He made the Hall of Fame last year, 2017. He was a dominant scorer.

Bryce can score, but he is more of a run producer; and with that production is the inherent power in his swing. This season Harper is hitting a disappointing .230, with a decent  on-base percentage (.385), which is what Raines did for his career. That is good enough for the Hall of Fame for a guy who gets on base. Moves the line. Wins games.

Now Bryce is moving up to 427 all time, in his seventh year. He is hitting home runs at a really good pace, but not getting enough hits. It seems his strike outs are up; not enough contact on pitches. The Nats are doing all right overall. His teams are usually winners.


427.Bryce Harper (7, 25)169LHR Log
 Ramon Hernandez (15)169RHR Log
 Lloyd Moseby (12)169LHR Log
 Pete O'Brien (12)169LHR Log
 Alex Rios (12)169RHR Log
 Enos Slaughter+ (19)169LHR Log
 Ty Wigginton (12)169RHR Log       

These guys took longer to get here, ranging in careers from 12 to 19 years. Some were not necessarily power hitters, like Raines, who had some power but his specialty was getting on base and moving on the paths. Slaughter, a multiple-time MVP candidate with the Saint Louis Cardinals, would have likely had 30 to 50 more home runs if he had not gone into 3 years of military service during World War II. Talk about an athletic hero to emulate or honor! Winnington was a major league product of only the 21st century, as was Alex Rios, and almost Ramon Hernandez who became a major leaguer first in 1999.


Sunday, June 10, 2018

Bryce Harper Moving Up---Makes 433 All-Time

Bryce Harper Moving Up---Makes 433 All-Time


Bryce Harper hit his 19th home run of his seventh season, yesterday, capping a win over the San Francisco Giants in DC, the friendly confines. It was a warm day. The winners of the NHL Championship held up the Stanley Cup, pretty unique. It was the superstar, Alex Ovechkin, and a couple teammates.

He is now tied with Jose Hernandez, a 15 year player who retired in 2006 at age 36. For Bryce to really have a good shot at becoming one of the top twenty elite all-time home run hitters, he will probably need to play until he is 38 or 40. But time will tell.

Recent players passed:

433.Bryce Harper (7, 25)168LHR Log
 Jose Hernandez (15)168RHR Log
435.Casey Blake (13)167RHR Log
 Elston Howard (14)167RHR Log
 Charles Johnson (12)167RHR Log
 Gus Triandos (13)167RHR Log
439.Tony Conigliaro (8)166RHR Log
 Larry Hisle (14)166RHR Log
 Dwayne Murphy (12)166LHR Log
 Bill Robinson (16)166RHR Log
 Paul Sorrento (11)166LHR Log

Only Tony Conigliaro had similar output in years played. He played famously with the Boston Red Sox until a serious eye injury in effect ending his career from taking a pitch in the face in 1971 at age 26. He tried coming back a few years later at age 30, but wound up playing only 21 games and retired.

Based on starting in the majors at age 19 and hitting 24 his rookie year, Conigliaro was destined for greatness, similar to Bryce now. Only the money and arguably the fame is much greater now. In 2007 the Red Sox dedicated a new section of seating to this former would-be legend; he is not forgotten.

I told my son today, discussing this event, that maybe if he had had the same injury in the 21st century possibly they could have fixed him up like they have done power hitter Giancarlo Stanton and others.

Our respects, Tony. You played the game great.

I hope Bryce gets a chance to know you. And the rest of us.

Keep it going Bryce!

168 and counting! Onward and upward, stay safe.